DaBaldo contends that the bench ruling was based on disease confusion. Delaware is a multi-disease jurisdiction, meaning each distinct disease caused by asbestos exposure is subject to its own claim, as well as its own statute of limitations. Put simply, each of the various asbestos-related diseases is recognized as a separate and distinct disease. Accordingly, DaBaldos claim based on the pleural disease diagnosis is separate from his claim based on the asbestosis diagnosis for the purposes of the statute of limitations in this case, Holland wrote. Therefore, DaBaldo clarifies that his claims should not be time-barred because he was only diagnosed with pleural disease in 1992 and was unaware of his asbestosis until 2007, separating the two cases. However, the defense argues the disease confusion theory was not fairly presented to the Superior Court, barring it. The Supreme Court issued a four-factor test to determine when statute of limitations begins: the plaintiffs level of knowledge and education, the extent of his recourse to medical evaluation, the consistency of the medical diagnosis and DaBaldos follow-up efforts during the period of latency following initial recourse to medical evaluation. For the first test, Holland stated that no evidence on record suggests that the claimants level of knowledge or education was above average, especially with regards to asbestos or asbestos-related diseases.
original version plus supplementary visit http://washingtonexaminer.com/del.-sc-reverses-decision-in-asbestosis-case-gives-lawsuit-new-life/article/feed/2118377
For the first time, asbestosis victims compensated
MLPC has been fighting for justice since 2007 and after three examinations by the National Institute of Occupational Health (NIOH) with intervention of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) besides confirmation of asbestosis among the former asbestos mine workers, Friday was a day to celebrate. The state has also said those found to be suffering from any of these diseases will be given a relief amount of Rs one lakh each. Those who have already succumbed to the disease, their widows will be given a relief amount of Rs three lakh each. Of the 18 asbestosis victims, one died waiting for the Pneumoconiosis Board to be set up, while one missed the re-examination. The district administration assured that the remaining two will also be given the relief money, once the paper work is completed. So far, the state has given relief amounts to silicosis victims and to family of those who succumbed to the disease. This is the first time in the country when asbestosis victims were given monetary relief by the state government. Reader’s opinions
original version plus supplementary visit http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-12-21/jaipur/45443405_1_asbestosis-victims-silicosis-victims-former-asbestos-mine-workers
Asbestosis and Mesothelioma Cancer Differences
READ MORE ASBESTOSIS LEGAL NEWS UK Steel Plant Workers Alleged to Have Had S.. The defendant, while not disputing liability, sought only a reduced award for adult children, whom the defendant thought should get a lesser amount than that awarded to the deceased mans wife. In the end, Bankheads widow Emily was awarded $6 million in her subsequent asbestosis claim, with Tammy Bankhead and Debbie Bankhead-Meiers awarded $2.5 million each – bringing the total gross award to $11 million. However, given the defendants prior liability finding at 30 percent, the gross award was reduced to net $3.3 million. In August the plaintiffs in their asbestosis claim had asked for $2 million in compensation for Emily Bankhead and $500,000 each for the two adult children.
original version plus supplementary visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/asbestosis/asbestosis-lawsuit-lawyer-16-19470.html
Family of Asbestosis Disease Victim Receives Two Sets of Awards
The cells of the mesothelium of a particular organ get disturbed. These cells now become abnormal and form tumors, may remain benign or malignant, invading the neighboring tissues of the organs. The symptoms of mesothelioma are similar to asbestosis, and the treatment is based on the killing the cancerous cells and tumors. Through surgery, the removal of the tumors or the organs takes place. Radiation and chemotherapy, and other allied therapies., are alsomade use of. Comparison between the asbestosis and the mesothelioma cancers. Asbestosis is very similar to mesothelioma cancer. The cause of both the diseases are due to the exposure to asbestos. The symptoms also match, and often the treatment is also the same.
original version plus supplementary visit http://www.wiredprnews.com/2009/07/04/differences-asbestosis-mesothelioma-cancer_200907044465.html